Legal Opinion
Chicago, B. & Q. R. v. Conway
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided November 17, 1928No. 8119PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POLLOCK, District Judge.
Defendant in error, as plaintiff, brought this action against the railroad company to recover damages for personal injuries received while riding as a passenger on one of defendant’s trains, which train, was derailed and plaintiff injured by being thrown against a washstand in the washroom of a Pullman car. Liability for the damages received by plaintiff is admitted, and only the question of the amount of damages for the injuries received is in dispute. The jury allowed plaintiff $20,000. The assignments of error bring before this court for review only three grounds of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Clyde Mattox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Holmgren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Denver & R. G. R. v. RodderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1900
- O'Leary v. Scullin Steel CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1924
- Busch & Latta Painting Co. v. Woermann Construction Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1925
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Grismore v. Consolidated Products Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1942
- Elzig v. GudwangenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1937
- Illinois Power & Light Corporation v. HurleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
- Cropper v. Titanium Pigment Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
- ætna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Reliable Auto Tire Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.