Legal Opinion
Amalfitano v. Rosenberg
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 20, 2006No. 04 Civ.2027(NRB)PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
BUCHWALD, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Vivia Amalfitano (“Mrs.Amalfitano”) and Gerard Amalfitano, Esq. (“Mr.Amalfitano”) (collectively, “plaintiffs” or “the Amalfitanos”) have brought this diversity action against attorney Armand J. Rosenberg, Esq. (“defendant” or “Rosenberg”). Plaintiffs allege that Rosenberg violated New York Judiciary Law § 487 (“ § 487”) in the course of his representation of Mrs. Amalfitano’s uncle, Peter Costalas (“Peter”), who was the plaintiff in an earlier lawsuit brought against the Amalfitanos in New York state court. For the reasons stated below,…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- United States v. Louis KovelCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
- The Travelers Insurance Company v. 633 Third AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Francis Schertenleib v. Jerome S. TraumCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Jacqueline E. Michalski v. The Home Depot, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Phansalkar v. Andersen Weinroth & Co., L.P.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Amalfitano v. RosenbergNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
- Amalfitano v. RosenbergCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Ray v. WatnickDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- Bryant v. SilvermanDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- Rice v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2017
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.