Legal Opinion

State v. Mealey

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided May 31, 1956No. 4480PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDuncan, J.

By motion to dismiss made in advance of the trial and renewed at the close of the State’s evidence, the respondent sought dismissal of the indictment upon the ground that it failed to set forth an offense. His motion further brought in question the sufficiency of the evidence to warrant conviction under RSA 262:23. The material portions of this statute provide as follows: “Any person operating a motor vehicle, knowing that injury has been caused by him to a person or to property, shall forthwith bring his vehicle to a stop, return to the scene of the accident, give to the operator of any…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kelley v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Runyon v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1941
  3. State v. GosselinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1939
  4. People v. HuberCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. HoytSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974
  2. State v. LaponseeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1975
  3. State v. SebbenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1971
  4. State v. SebbenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API