Legal Opinion

Plazuela Sugar Co. v. Alvarez

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided February 5, 1924No. 1658Published

1Opinion of the Court

ANDERSON, Circuit Judge.

This case is ruled by Plazuela Sugar Co. v. Pastoriza, 245 Fed. 115, 157 C. C. A. 411. It comes here on appeal from the Supreme Court of Porto Rico, reversing the district court of Arecibo, and holding that the appellant sugar company had no easement or other legal right, however námed, to maintain and operate the railroad tracks over the appellee’s land; that the tracks were placed and remained on the locus under a merely revocable oral license.

The rule that the decision of that court on a question of local law should be affirmed, unless clearly erroneous, applies.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cardona v. QuinonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Plazuela Sugar Co. v. PastorizaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1917
  3. Fitch v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API