Legal Opinion

Fitch v. Richardson

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided February 23, 1906No. 607PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

This appeal was submitted by the appellee on brief, but the appellant has neither filed a brief nor applied to be heard orally. Under the rules and practice of the court, the appellee is entitled to have the appeal dismissed, or, perhaps, to have the judgment affirmed. Portland Company v. United States, 15 Wall. 1, 21 L. Ed. 113; Ryan v. Koch, 17 Wall. 19, 21 L. Ed. 611. Or, the court at its option might open the record and dispose of the case on its merits. In view of the fact that the appellee has filed a brief, the court might possibly do the latter of its own motion if the assignment of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bank v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  2. Bailey v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1873
  3. Portland Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1873

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Plazuela Sugar Co. v. AlvarezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1924
  2. Zalduondo v. CivilleCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API