Legal Opinion
Ahrens v. Chisena
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 15, 2007PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for legal malpractice, the defendant Ronald J. Chisena appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Ayres, J.), dated November 18, 2005, as, after a hearing to determine the validity of service of process, inter alia, granted the plaintiffs’ motion for leave to enter a default judgment against him.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
“The advocate-witness disqualification rules contained in the *788Code of Professional Responsibility provide guidance, not binding authority, for…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- S & S Hotel Ventures Limited Partnership v. 777 S. H. Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Lattingtown Harbor Property Owners Ass'n v. AgostinoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Home Federal Savings Bank v. MahoodAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Demakis v. PapadopoulosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
3Cited by10 opinions
- Lopez v. DePietroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- American Home Mortgage v. VillaflorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- King v. GilAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Shaw Funding, L.P. v. SamuelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Federal Financial Co. v. Public AdministratorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.