Legal Opinion

Robins v. Central of Georgia Ry.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 9, 1925No. 7 Div. 440PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.

Appellant’s cause of action rests upon the doctrine of the “turntable cases,” and upon former appeal it was held the principle of these authorities was not applicable to plaintiff, a boy 15 years of age. Central of Georgia Ry. v. Robins, 209 Ala. 6, 95 So. 367.

Upon remandment of the canse the complaint‘was amended hy adding count A, wherein plaintiff attempts to set up a cause of action as for wanton or willful injury. On former appeal this court concluded that plaintiff did not come within the class to whom defendant owed the duty sought to he invoked hy the principle of the “turntable…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Central of Georgia R. Co. v. RobinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  2. Steele v. BookerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  3. Gandy v. CopelandSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  4. Crawford v. MillsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
  5. Gulf Yellow Pine Co. v. UrquhartSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Roll v. DockerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  2. Alabama By-Products Corporation v. CosbySupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  3. Isbell v. BraySupreme Court of Alabama · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API