Legal Opinion

Isbell v. Bray

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 14, 1951No. 7 Div. 20PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LIVINGSTON, Chief Justice.

The appeal is from a verdict and judgment against appellant, Dr. W. J. Isbell, Jr., in the amount of $9363.00.

The court below allowed amendments of the original complaint which, by the jury’s verdict, eventuated in a complete or entire change of causes of action, not permitted under our statutes, and the cause must be reversed. This error, we think, renders unnecessary a. consideration of the many other assignments of error. Although there were many amendments, demurrers, motions and rulings thereon, we go directly to the point involved, without more detail than is…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Alabama Consolidated Coal & Iron Co. v. HealdSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
  2. Alabama Terminal & Inprovement Co. v. Hall & FarleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
  3. Spurling v. FillingimSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
  4. Bridwell v. Brotherhood of Railroad TrainmenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  5. Gaines v. Birmingham Ry. L. & P. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1909

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. ALFA Mut. Ins. Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. United States Steel Corp. v. McGeheeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
  3. Gulf States Steel, Inc. v. WhiteCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1999
  4. Nason v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1965
  5. Bank of the Southeast v. JacksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API