McLeod v. Mills
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.)
The principles of law announced in the first, second, and third headnotes are supported by the following authorities: 1 Collier on Bankruptcy (10th ed.), 285-300; Rosenthal v. Nove, 175 Mass. 559 (56 N. E. 884, 78 Am. St. R. 512); Rogers v. Abbot, 206 Mass. 270, 274 (92 S. E. 472, 138 Am. St. Rep. 394); In re Buchanan, 219 Fed. 492. In the case last cited it is said: “ It was not improper for the bankruptcy court to allow the suits to be prosecuted to judgment, as this would be a convenient way of liquidating the claims of the creditors, the amount of which…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Rosenthal v. NoveMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
- Vadner v. VadnerDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1918
- Rogers v. AbbotMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
- Rountree v. RutherfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1880
- In re BuchananCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1914
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Portwood v. ShaferCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
- In re LockerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1939
- Carter v. BassettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923