Legal Opinion

McLeod v. Mills

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 23, 1922No. 13052PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.)

The principles of law announced in the first, second, and third headnotes are supported by the following authorities: 1 Collier on Bankruptcy (10th ed.), 285-300; Rosenthal v. Nove, 175 Mass. 559 (56 N. E. 884, 78 Am. St. R. 512); Rogers v. Abbot, 206 Mass. 270, 274 (92 S. E. 472, 138 Am. St. Rep. 394); In re Buchanan, 219 Fed. 492. In the case last cited it is said: “ It was not improper for the bankruptcy court to allow the suits to be prosecuted to judgment, as this would be a convenient way of liquidating the claims of the creditors, the amount of which…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Rosenthal v. NoveMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
  2. Vadner v. VadnerDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1918
  3. Rogers v. AbbotMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
  4. Rountree v. RutherfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1880
  5. In re BuchananCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1914

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Portwood v. ShaferCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
  2. In re LockerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1939
  3. Carter v. BassettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API