Legal Opinion

Sieber v. Laawe

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided November 8, 1954Published

1Opinion of the Court

33 N.J. Super. 115 (1954)

109 A.2d 470

ARTHUR E. SIEBER, DARWIN A. SIEBER, ELMER H. KUEHN, GEORGE WEISE, ANTHONY VIVINO, MATTHEW RIZZO, MICHAEL ARDIS, SAMUEL M. CONFORTH, JOHN LEONE, AND ERNEST A. DEL PRETE, PLAINTIFFS,

v.

HAROLD W. LAAWE, STANLEY O. STYLES, WALTER MODES, OLAF HAROLDSON, JOHN RATCLIFFE, AND THE TOWNSHIP COMMITTEE OF THE TOWNSHIP OF WAYNE, DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.

Decided November 8, 1954.

Mr. Saul M. Mann, attorney for plaintiffs.

Mr. Salvatore J. Ruggiero, attorney for defendants.

Messrs. Greenburg, Wilensky & Feinberg (Mr. Victor Greenburg, appearing),…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Hadacheck v. SebastianSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. Noble State Bank v. HaskellSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  4. Miller v. SchoeneSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  5. Purity Extract & Tonic Co. v. LynchSupreme Court of the United States · 1912

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API