Legal Opinion

Reed Lumber Co. v. Lewis

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 15, 1891PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Appear from the City Court of Anniston. Tried before the Hon. B. F. Oassady.

1Opinion of the CourtMcCLELLAN, J.

— This action is on promissory notes executed by the Heed Lumber Company, which is alleged to be a partnership composed of W. T. Farrar, Emily Farrar, the wife of W. T. Farrar, and O. W. Burrows. The suit is against the company and the individuals composing it. The company, W. T. Farrar and Burrows pleaded in recoupment, that the notes w'ere given for the price of certain machinery to be presently delivered; that it was not delivered for two months afterwards; that the machinery was a part of a saw-mill without which the mill could not be run; that plaintiff knew the uses to which it was to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Griffin v. . ColverNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
  2. Devlin v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  3. Daughtery v. American Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1883
  4. Bell v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1885
  5. Street v. SinclairSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Southern Railway Co. v. ColemanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
  2. Bixby-Theirson Lumber Co. v. EvansSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  3. Dickerson v. FinleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
  4. Lytle & Co. v. Bank of DothanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
  5. St.Louis & S. F. R. R. v. SuttonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API