Legal Opinion
In Re Hudik-Ross Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 26, 1961PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McGOHEY, District Judge.
Two motions herein which were argued together are here considered. One seeks dismissal of the petition for lack of jurisdiction; the other seeks transfer to the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey of so much of the proceedings as relates to Hudik-Ross, Inc. The motion seeking dismissal will be considered first.
The contention is that there being no specific authority in the Bankruptcy Act for the filing of a joint petition by two corporations for an arrangement under Chapter XI, 11 U.S.C.A. § 701 et seq., the court is without jurisdiction to…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Kelly v. United States Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960
- In re Guanacevi Tunnel Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1912
- In Re Hudson River Nav. CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
- In Re Triton Chemical CorporationDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1942
- In re Marine Machine & Conveyor Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1899
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Inland Rubber Corporation v. Triple a Tire Service, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1963
- Matter of Landmark Capital Co.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1982
- Hadar Leasing International Co. v. D. H. Overmyer Telecasting Co. (In Re Hadar Leasing International Co.)District Court, S.D. New York · 1981
- In re Bankers TrustCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1968
- In Re Enron Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2002
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.