Legal Opinion

United Shoe Machinery Co. v. Caunt

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts

Decided December 26, 1904No. 1,939PublishedCited by 8 opinions

In Equity. On exceptions to answer.

1Opinion of the Court

LOWELL, District Judge.

Complainant brought a bill in equity to restrain the infringement of letters patent No. 461,793, granted October 20, 1891. The bill alleged a covenant of the defendant, dated January 2, 1902, admitting the validity of the patent. The covenant in question (contained in a lease for the term of 17 years, which may be referred to by agreement of counsel) is as follows:

“Ten. The lessee admits the validity of each and every of the letters patent of the United States of America, owned by the» lessor or under which it is licensed; any of the inventions of which are or hereafter…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bate Refrigerating Co. v. SulzbergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Edison Electric Light Co. v. United States Electric Lighting Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1892
  3. Bate Refrigerating Co. v. HammondSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  4. Pohl v. Anchor Brewing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1890
  5. Brush Electric Co. v. Electrical Accumulator Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1891

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Schutte & Koerting Co. v. Wheeler Condenser & EngineerIng Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1924
  2. Eskimo Pie Corporation v. National Ice Cream Co.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1927
  3. 4-One Box Machine Makers v. Wirebounds Patents Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1932
  4. United States v. Wayne Pump Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1942
  5. United Printing Machinery Co. v. Cross Paper Feeder Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1915

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API