Legal Opinion

Brush Electric Co. v. Electrical Accumulator Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Decided July 23, 1891PublishedCited by 11 opinions

In Equity.

1Opinion of the CourtCone, J.

This is an equity action founded upon three letters patent, granted to Charles F. Brush for improvements in secondary batteries, as follows: No. 337,299, granted March 2,1886, No. 260,654, granted July 4,1882, and No. 266,090, granted October 17,1882. These patents and one other, No. 337,298, granted March 2,1886, were before this court in Brush Electric Co. v. Julien Electric Co., 41 Fed. Rep. 679. The court there decided that No. 337,298 and No. 337, 299 were for the same invention, and intimated, as the inventor and his expert apparently regarded the former as the broader patent, that the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Siemens's Administrator v. SellersSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Commercial Manufacturing Co. v. Fairbank Canning Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1890

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Ensten v. Simon, Ascher & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. General Electric Co. v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
  3. Thomson-Houston Electric Co. v. Winchester Ave. Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut · 1895
  4. Electro-Dynamic Co. v. The ElectronCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1896
  5. General Electric Co. v. AlexanderDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1921

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API