Legal Opinion
quizinsight.com Partnership v. Tabak
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 4, 2019No. Civil Action No. 2018-1878Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA QUIZINSIGHT.COM PARTNERSHIP, et al., Plaintiffs, No. 18-cv-1878 (DLF) v. ROSS LEE TABAK, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiffs Roy Feinson and two partnerships sue defendant Ross Lee Tabak for, among other things, interfering with the advertising revenue of three websites. See Compl., Dkt. 1. Before the Court is Tabak’s Motion to Dismiss, Dkt. 12, for lack of jurisdiction and for failure to state a claim for relief. For the reasons that follow, the Court will grant the motion in part, deny it in part, and stay all surviving claims…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.