Legal Opinion

Dullea v. Retirement Board

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 8, 1945PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRonan, J.

This is an appeal taken by nine plaintiffs, who were reserve firemen of the city of Peabody on July 1, 1937, when the contributory retirement system-, G. L. (Ter. *526Ed.) c. 32, §§ 26-31H, inclusive, as inserted by St. 1936, c. 318, § 1, became effective in said city, and all of whom have since remained reserve firemen with the exception of Dullea, who since November 14, 1937, has.been a permanent fireman, from a final decree dismissing as to them a bill of complaint filed on April 2, 1943, in which they sought an injunction to prohibit further deductions from their pay as contributions to the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Town of HudsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  2. Decatur v. Auditor of PeabodyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
  3. Town of Saugus v. B. Perini & Sons, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  4. Hinckley v. Retirement BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  5. Ford v. Retirement BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Town of Brookline v. Co-Ray Realty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
  2. School Committee v. City of GloucesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API