Legal Opinion

Edie v. Brundage Co.

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided September 10, 1982No. K80-501 CAPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BENJAMIN F. GIBSON, District Judge.

This action is brought pursuant to § 301 of the Labor-Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 185. Plaintiff alleges that defendant Brundage Company, his former employer, breached their collective bargaining agreement (CBA) by improperly terminating his employment. Plaintiff also charged his union, United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO, with breach of its duty of fair representation. 1 Now before this Court are defendant’s motion for summary judgment; defendant contends that the Sixth Circuit’s recent decision in Badon v. General Motors Corp., 679…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. United Steelworkers v. American Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bradford v. General Telephone Co. of MichiganDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1985
  2. Waller v. International Harvester Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1983
  3. Fifield v. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers, Local 137District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1983
  4. Fifield v. INTERN. U., UNITED AUTO., AEROSPACE, ETC.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API