Hodges v. Georgia Kaolin Company
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Ebhrhardt, Judge.
The battleground of the parties here presents the problem of whether the Company was under obligation to mine any kaolin from the leased premises prior to the bringing of this action in 1961. The plaintiff Hodges asks that we hold that there was an implied covenant in the lease obligating the Company to begin mining operations within a reasonable time after it was executed. On the other hand, the Company advances a number of reasons why no such covenant should be found, asserting that the contract language is clear and unambiguous.
The provisions in the lease that payment of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Grant v. HaymesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
- Dixie Seed Company v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
- Crawford v. SumerauCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
3Cited by13 opinions
- WirelessMD, Inc. v. Healthcare. Com Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
- Higginbottom v. Thiele Kaolin Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1983
- Davidson Mineral Properties, Inc. v. BairdSupreme Court of Georgia · 1990
- Southern Land, Timber & Pulp Corp. v. Davis & Floyd Engineers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
- Willis v. First Data POS, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.