Legal Opinion

Golf Holding Co. v. McEachron

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 18, 1979No. 77-1704-E-2, CA 11105PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtTanzer, J.

In its petition for reconsideration, Golf Holding Company asserts that the statement in our previous opinion, 39 Or App 675, 681, 593 P2d 1202 (1979), that "there is an undeveloped public road through the golf course” is inaccurate. Petitioner contends that there is no substantial evidence to support our conclusion and the implicit finding of the city council that such a public road exists, because, according to petitioner, the only evidence concerning the status of the road was the testimony of petitioner’s attorney, who testified that there was no formal record of it.

Petitioner’s summary of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Golf Holding Co. v. McEachronCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Feitelson v. City of SalemCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API