Legal Opinion

Raino v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided August 31, 1992No. 23703PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Moore, Justice:

This is a strict liability case. Appellants Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company (Goodyear) and Lee Tire Company (Lee) allege that the trial judge erred in ruling evidence relating to alcohol was inadmissible and in failing to grant Goodyear’s motions for dismissal. We affirm.

I. FACTS

Respondent Cynthia Raino (Raino) was seriously injured in a single car accident on July 25, 1987, at 9:00 a.m. outside Hardeeville. On August 9, 1988, Raino brought this action in Hampton County against Goodyear, Lee, Stokes Honda of Beaufort, Inc. (Stokes), and Barnard Tire Company (Barnard) under the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Benton Ex Rel. Benton v. PellumSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1957
  2. Watson v. Wilkinson Trucking Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1964
  3. Livingston v. Noland Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
  4. Holloman v. McAllisterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1986
  5. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Ballenger v. BowenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
  2. Olson v. Faculty House of Carolina, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
  3. State v. CribbSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  4. State v. CarterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
  5. Stevens v. AllenCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API