Commonwealth v. Garzone
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Chief Justice CASTILLE.
The issue in these consolidated appeals involves the construction of 16 P.S. § 7708, applicable to Pennsylvania counties of the first class, which provides that “in cases where a defendant is convicted and sentenced to pay the costs of prosecution and trial, the expenses of the district attorney, in connection with such prosecution, shall be considered a part of the costs of the cases and be paid by the defendant.”1 The specific question is whether a trial court may order a convicted offender to pay costs to the Commonwealth representing salaries for hours worked…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Commonwealth v. ReavesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Commonwealth v. MastromarinoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Commonwealth v. HugginsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Commonwealth v. BoothSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- In Re HicksonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Commonwealth v. HallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Commonwealth v. NypaverSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Commonwealth v. VeonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- Commonwealth v. ChildsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Mercury Trucking, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.