Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Martyniuk

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 2017No. 2016-1821PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Respondent, Andrew Osyp Martyniuk, of Kent, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0064997, was admitted to the practice of law in Ohio in 1995. On November 20, 2015, we suspended his license to practice for an interim period pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(18)(A)(1)(a) upon receiving notice that he had been convicted of multiple felonies. In re Martyniuk, 144 Ohio St.3d 1265, 2015-Ohio-4746, 45 N.E.3d 1013.

{¶ 2} In April 2016, relator, disciplinary counsel, charged Martyniuk with violations of Prof.Cond.R. 8.4(b) (prohibiting a lawyer from committing an illegal act that adversely reflects on the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. BrickerOhio Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. GrossmanOhio Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Dayton Bar Association v. BallatoOhio Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. ButlerOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  5. In re MartyniukOhio Supreme Court · 2015

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. Connors (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. Polizzi (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2021
  3. Toledo Bar Assn. v. Long (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2021
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. NortonOhio Supreme Court · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API