Legal Opinion

Sirmans v. Penn

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided April 11, 1991PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HORSEY, Justice:

This appeal raises an issue of tort law involving the foreseeability of negligent conduct leading to injury, the cause of which is an intervening criminal act of a third party. Plaintiff Angelia Sirmans, injured without fault when struck by a stolen motor vehicle, sued Denzil Penn, Jr., the owner of the vehicle, for negligence proximately causing her injuries. Following a jury trial verdict for defendant Penn, plain tiff Sirmans appeals Superior Court’s denial of her motion for a new trial.

Sirmans asserts two grounds for reversible error: (1) that the jury was confused as a…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Hill v. YaskinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
  2. Culver v. BennettSupreme Court of Delaware · 1991
  3. Robelen Piano Company v. Di FonzoSupreme Court of Delaware · 1961
  4. Storey v. CastnerSupreme Court of Delaware · 1973
  5. Rohner v. NiemannSupreme Court of Delaware · 1977

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Ramsey v. Georgia Southern University Advanced Development CtrSupreme Court of Delaware · 2018
  2. Duphily v. Delaware Electric Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1995
  3. Koutoufaris v. DickSupreme Court of Delaware · 1992
  4. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2006
  5. Hudson v. Old Guard Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2010

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API