Scioto Valley Ry. & Power Co. v. Public Utilities Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court.
Two questions are presented by this record:
First, the right of the Ohio Transit Company to operate the 18-passenger bus. This question has been heretofore determined in the case of Scioto Valley Railway & Power Co. v. Public Utilities Commission, 115 Ohio St., 358, 154 N. E., 320, decided November 23, 1926. The seven 7-passenger busses authorized by fife (Certificate granted upon affidavit based on the operations of April 28, 1923, together with the 18-passenger bus thereafter authorized, were recognized as the Ohio Transit Company’s authorized equipment. That case being between…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Scioto Valley Ry. & Power Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1926
3Cited by5 opinions
- Alspaugh v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1946
- Miami Valley Transit Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1927
- Midwestern Motor Transit, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1933
- Dayton & Troy Electric Ry. Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1929
- Lattavo Brothers, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1946