Legal Opinion

Scioto Valley Ry. & Power Co. v. Public Utilities Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1927No. 20399PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

Two questions are presented by this record:

First, the right of the Ohio Transit Company to operate the 18-passenger bus. This question has been heretofore determined in the case of Scioto Valley Railway & Power Co. v. Public Utilities Commission, 115 Ohio St., 358, 154 N. E., 320, decided November 23, 1926. The seven 7-passenger busses authorized by fife (Certificate granted upon affidavit based on the operations of April 28, 1923, together with the 18-passenger bus thereafter authorized, were recognized as the Ohio Transit Company’s authorized equipment. That case being between…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Scioto Valley Ry. & Power Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Alspaugh v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Miami Valley Transit Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Midwestern Motor Transit, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Dayton & Troy Electric Ry. Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Lattavo Brothers, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API