Legal Opinion

Peevey v. Buchanan

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1914PublishedCited by 4 opinions

PROM’ DAVIDSON. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Davidson County to the Conrt of Civil Appeals and by certiorari to the Conrt of Civil Appeals from the Supreme Conrt. —Johit Allison, Chancellor.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Neil

The suit was brought upon a note of $318.60, signed by defendants, of which the following is a literal copy:

Birmingham, Ala., 10/22/1908. $318.60.

On the 1st day of September 1909', without grace, for value received, we promise to pay to the order of Hinds Peevey .... three hundred eighteen and 60/100 .... dollars with interest 8% in United States gold coin of present standard weight and fineness, at the People’s Savings Bank and Trust Co., Birmingham, Ala., at 8%-intereg-t from date.- [And I Sallie 0. Buchanan, wife of R. Gr. Buchanan, do hereby expressly bind my separate estate for the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stephens v. DavisTennessee Supreme Court · 1886
  2. McDaniel v. WhitsettTennessee Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Deering Harvester Co. v. WhiteTennessee Supreme Court · 1902
  4. State ex rel. Cannon v. LeeTennessee Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Moss v. MadduxTennessee Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Snyder v. McEwenTennessee Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Miller v. KendrickTennessee Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Haynes v. MullinsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1947
  4. Branch v. BranchTennessee Supreme Court · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API