Legal Opinion

Carzell Moore v. Walter D. Zant, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided August 31, 1992No. 91-8297PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal in a death penalty case. Because of the lack of an adequate jury instruction on the option to impose a life sentence under the circumstances, we earlier set aside Carzell Moore’s sentence of death. Moore v. Kemp, 809 F.2d 702, 733 (11th Cir.1987) (en banc). We also remanded the case for an evidentiary hearing on whether there had been a violation of Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963), or Giglio v. United States, 405 U.S. 150, 92 S.Ct. 763, 31 L.Ed.2d 104 (1972). We wrote, “After disposing of that claim, and depending on its ruling thereon,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
  3. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Mahler v. EbySupreme Court of the United States · 1924

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Harvest v. CastroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  2. State v. ChambersSupreme Court of Missouri · 1995
  3. Wynn Satterlee v. Hugh WolfenbargerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  4. Jones v. CainCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
  5. Foster v. LockhartCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API