Legal Opinion

United States v. Michael Bryant, Jr.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 30, 2014No. 12-30177PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Judge PAEZ; Concurrence by Judge WATFORD.

OPINION

PAEZ, Circuit Judge:

Michael Bryant, Jr., an Indian, was indicted on two counts of domestic assault by *673a habitual offender, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 117(a).1 In support of the charges, the government relied on two pri- or tribal court convictions for domestic abuse. These convictions were uncoun-seled and at least one resulted in a term of imprisonment. The Sixth Amendment guarantees indigent defendants in state and federal criminal proceedings appointed counsel in any case where a term of imprisonment is imposed. Scott v. Illinois,…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. United States v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. BryantSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  2. United States v. Terry HarlanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
  3. United States v. BryantSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  4. United States v. BryantSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  5. United States v. LongDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2016

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API