Legal Opinion

United States v. Long

District Court, D. South Dakota

Decided May 6, 2016No. 3:15-CR-30118-RALPublished

1Opinion of the Court

*1117OPINION AND ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS CERTAIN COUNTS OF THE SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT

ROBERTO A. LANGE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Defendant Michael Lee Long, Jr. (“Long”) moves to dismiss five of the seven counts of the Superseding Indictment. Doc. 37. Specifically, Long moves to dismiss Counts II, III, VI, and VII based on multiplicity under the Fifth Amendment’s Double Jeopardy Clause, and Count TV because the predicate offense is an un-counseled tribal court conviction. Doc. 37; Doc. 38 at 2-9. The Government opposes the motion. Doc. 39. For the reasons stated below, judgment is…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Alabama v. SheltonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. United States v. Daniel Chalan, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
  4. United States v. William Maurice SmithCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
  5. United States v. LucasCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API