Legal Opinion

Street v. Honorable Second Court of Appeals

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 1988No. C-7345PublishedCited by 81 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PHILLIPS, Chief Justice.

The question presented is when an underlying tort action becomes final so that a defendant may institute a Stowers action against its insurer. We hold that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to abate the insured’s Stowers action, together with certain interventions, merely because the underlying tort action was still pending on appeal. Therefore, we conditionally order the court of appeals to vacate its conditional writ of mandamus directing the trial court to abate all causes of action against the insurer.

The underlying lawsuit arose out…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Fourth Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Arnold v. National County Mutual Fire Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1987
  3. G. A. Stowers Furniture Co. v. American Indemnity Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1929
  4. State v. WalkerTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Scurlock Oil Co. v. SmithwickTexas Supreme Court · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by81 opinions

  1. Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Murray v. San Jacinto Agency, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Rocor International, Inc. v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of PittsburghTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Sultan v. MathewTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  5. In re J.B. Hunt Transport, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2016

76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API