Legal Opinion

Penny v. Cash

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 5, 1946No. 15538PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Duckworth, Justice.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) Since the controlling issue turns upon a receiver’s deed, it is important that certain law applicable to such a sale be observed. The sale by the receiver was a judicial sale. Southern Cotton Mills v. Ragan, 138 Ga. 504 (1) (75 S. E. 611); Alexander v. Holmes, 180 Ga. 397 (179 S. E. 77). To such a sale the maxim caveat emptor applies. Kurfees v. Davis, 178 Ga. 429 (173 S. E. 157). Confirmation by the court is an essential part of such sale. Hall v. Taylor, 133 Ga. 606 (66 S. E. 478); Pledger v. Bank of Lyerly, 157 Ga. 229 (121 S. E.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hurt Building Inc. v. Atlanta Trust Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1935
  2. Brooks v. RooneySupreme Court of Georgia · 1852
  3. Faughnan v. BashlorSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
  4. Allen v. BemisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
  5. Hall v. TaylorSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re WheelerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 1980
  2. Gooden v. Buffalo Savings Bank (In Re Gooden)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 1982
  3. Leggett v. OgdenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
  4. Cml-Ga Smyrna, LLC v. Atlanta Real Estate Investments, LLCSupreme Court of Georgia · 2014
  5. Timpson v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API