Legal Opinion

Mlnazek v. Libera

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 24, 1901No. Nos. 12,548 — (91)PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal by defendant Standard Life & Accident Insurance Company from an order of the district court for Winona county, Snow,. J., overruling a demurrer to the complaint.

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

Appeal from an order overruling a general demurrer to the complaint. The complaint alleges, substantially the following facts: Plaintiff and defendant Libera were on July 24, 1894, and prior thereto, co-partners engaged in contract work under the firm name of Libera & Mlnazek. On the day named, defendant Standard Life & Accident Insurance Company issued and delivered to the co-partnership a contract of insurance thereby indemnifying the firm against liability for injury to any of their employees caused while engaged in the course of their employment, and by which it contracted to pay to the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Haven v. NealSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  2. Cochran v. StewartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1875
  3. Sweet v. . MorrisonNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  4. Stanek v. LiberaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
  5. Mlnazek v. LiberaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. I. L. Corse & Co. v. Minnesota Grain Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  2. Slotkin v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
  3. Slotkin v. Citizens Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
  4. Marple v. Minneapolis & St. Louis RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
  5. Matsuura v. Alston & BirdCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API