Commonwealth v. Mebane
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
BENDER, J.
Appellant, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, appeals from the judgment of sentence imposed on Appellee, Lamar Me-bane. The Commonwealth contends that the trial court erred in finding that Me-bane was entitled to enforcement of a plea bargain that had been offered and accepted but where the prosecutor attempted to renege prior to presentation of the agreement to the court. The Commonwealth also asserts that Mebane’s sentence was *1244illegal as it did not conform to an otherwise applicable mandatory minimum sentencing provision. After careful review, we affirm.
Police arrested…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Puckett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Mabry v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Commonwealth v. SpenceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Commonwealth v. ParsonsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Commonwealth v. HainesworthSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Commonwealth v. PostieSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Shower, W.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- Com. v. Baynes, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- Com. v. Moss, R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.