Legal Opinion

Boush v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided December 4, 1902PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to a judgment of the Court of Law and Chancery of the city of Norfolk, rendered June 2, 1900, in an action of trespass on the Case, wherein the plaintiff in error was the plaintiff, and the defendant in error was the defendant.

1Opinion of the CourtWhittle, J.

This action was brought by the plaintiff in error against the defendant in error to recover damages for an alleged malicious prosecution, charging the plaintiff, as agent, at Norfolk, Virginia, of the Fidelity and Casualty Insurance Company, of New York, with the embezzlement of certain moneys, the property of his principal.

There was a verdict for the defendant, which the plaintiff moved the court to set aside upon the ground that it was contrary to the law and evidence, and also for misdirection of the jury by the court.

Both motions were overruled, and the plaintiff excepted.

The view taken…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Seaboard & Roanoke Railroad v. Joyner's Adm'rSupreme Court of Virginia · 1895
  2. Hansbrough v. Neal, Featherston & Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1897
  3. Montgomery v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1900

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Southern Railway Co. v. Aldridge's Adm'rSupreme Court of Virginia · 1903
  2. Douglas Land Co. v. T. W. Thayer Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1907
  3. Sims v. JaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. United States v. GroggDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API