Legal Opinion

United States v. Grogg

District Court, W.D. Virginia

Decided December 12, 1925PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MeDOWELL, District Judge.

The questions to be considered have arisen in a condemnation proceeding brought by the government to expropriate for its Eorest Reserve, inter alia, four tracts of land, each containing considerably less than 1;000 acres. The condemnation commissioners (section 4368, Code 1919) reported the amounts necessary as compensation and damages as to each tract separately, no exceptions to the report were filed, the report was confirmed, and the money was paid into court by the government. Thereupon (section 4374, id.) a reference was made to a commissioner to report as to the…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. United States v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  3. Insurance Co. v. RitchieSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  4. Reusens v. LawsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1895
  5. John Denn, Lessee of Charles C. Scott, and Others v. Thomas Reid, Jun., and OthersSupreme Court of the United States · 1836

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Madeline Wilkinson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
  2. United States v. Wythe County Iron & Zinc Corp.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 1926
  3. In re: Chartri DaecharkhomUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  4. Richardson v. Comm'n on Human Rights & OpportunitiesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
  5. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. RobinsonDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API