Legal Opinion

First Nat. Bank of Duncan v. Wallace

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 23, 1942No. 30380PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.

Plaintiff in error, herein referred to as plaintiff, sued defendant in error, herein referred to as defendant, in the district court of Oklahoma county, to recover judgment on two notes, setting up two separate causes of action.

At the same time pláintiff caused garnishments to be issued against certain insurance companies, wherein it was asserted that said insurance companies were indebted to defendant by reason of life insurance policies issued by the respective companies upon the life of defendant’s deceased husband in which defendant was named as beneficiary. Two of the garnishees, the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Board of Commissioners v. McIntoshSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
  2. Heidel v. BenedictSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
  3. Shelby v. ZieglerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  4. Watson v. JacksonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1880
  5. Sparks v. City Nat. Bank of LawtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Maryland Casualty Company v. Citizens National Bank of West HollywoodCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
  2. Butler v. BreckinridgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
  3. Thompson v. KrantzCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API