Legal Opinion

Matassarin v. Lynch

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided April 27, 1999No. 97-51081PublishedCited by 78 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BENAVIDES, Circuit Judge:

Plaintiff Patricia Matassarin appeals the district court’s grants of summary judgment dismissing her ERISA and securities claims. We affirm.

I

In this unusual employee benefits matter, Patricia Matassarin, who is the plaintiff/appellant and the current plaintiffs attorney of record, brought suit against the Great Empire Broadcasting, Inc. (“Great Empire”) employee stock ownership plan (“ESOP” or “Plan”) and its fiduciaries and author. The Great Empire ESOP is subject to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001 et seq.

Until 1988,…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by78 opinions

  1. Dow Chemical Co. v. FrancisTexas Supreme Court · 2001
  2. In Re H.E. Butt Grocery Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2000
  3. Patterson v. Mobil Oil Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
  4. Coan v. KaufmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  5. In Re Enron Corp. Securities, Derivative & ERISADistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2003

73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API