Legal Opinion

Appleton Pickett, Jr. v. Max Williams

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 19, 2012No. 11-35933UnpublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Oregon state prisoner Appleton Pickett, Jr., appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging various constitutional violations. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Universal Health Servs., Inc. v. Thompson, 363 F.3d 1013, 1019 (9th Cir.2004). We affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment on Pickett’s claim alleging failure to protect him from inmate assault because Pickett failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether defendants knew of and disregarded an excessive…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Simmons v. Navajo County, Ariz.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  5. Elmer PRATT, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James K. ROWLAND; James Gomez, Director; Daniel Vasquez; Robert Borg, Et Al., Defendants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. (PC) Evans v. PeeryDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
  2. (PC) Felder v. BrewerDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
  3. (PC) Hasha v. GamboaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
  4. (PC) Mendez v. CDCRDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
  5. (PC) Vallery v. BotkinDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API