Whitehurst v. Hurst Built, Inc.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
GEER, Judge.
This appeal addresses the application of the statute of repose in N.C. Gen. Stat. § l-50(a)(5)a to claims arising out of the installation of a synthetic stucco system on a house. We hold that the superior court properly granted defendant’s motion to dismiss when the complaint was filed more than six years after substantial completion of the house and, according to the complaint, the only acts subsequent to completion were repairs. 1
In January 1992, plaintiffs Mr. and Mrs. Whitehurst entered into a contract with defendant Hurst Built, Inc. (“Hurst”) for the construction and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Harris v. NCNB National Bank of North CarolinaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
- Block v. County of PersonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- Grant Construction Co. v. McRaeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- Monson v. Paramount Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
- Nolan v. Paramount Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In re Camp Lejeune North Carolina Water Contamination LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2016
- Blinson v. StateCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
- Sisk v. City of GreensboroCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
- Hodge v. HarkeyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
- Peach v. City of High PointCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.