Hagerman v. United Transportation Union
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge.
Employees and former employees of various railroads filed suit in 1998 against their employers and their unions after their jobs changed in connection with the merger of their employer railroads into one railroad entity. The district court granted summary judgment to defendants, and plaintiffs now appeal. For the reasons stated below, we affirm.
I
In 1995, several railroad entities sought to merge under the control of Union Pacific Railroad Company and applied to the Surface Transportation Board (the Board) for approval. 1 See 49 U.S.C. §§ 11323-26. Certain workers at the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. FoustSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. American Train Dispatchers' Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- New York Dock Railway and Brooklyn Eastern District Terminal v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Montgomery v. City of ArdmoreCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- James v. International Brotherhood of Locomotive EngineersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- Musto v. Transport Workers Union of AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2004
- Blanco v. Comcast Cable Communications Management, LLCDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2023
- Elk Energy Holdings, LLC v. Lippelmann Partners, LLCDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2023
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.