Legal Opinion

Abram v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided July 31, 2020No. 2:19-cv-02996Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION THOMAS M. ABRAM, Plaintiff, Civil Action 2:19-cv-2996 v. Judge Edmund A. Sargus, Jr. Chief Magistrate Judge Elizabeth P. Deavers COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Plaintiff, Thomas M. Abram, brings this action under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying his applications for social security disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. This matter is before the United States…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Debra Rogers v. Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  3. Blakley v. Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  4. Charlene M. CUTLIP, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
  5. Rabbers v. Commissioner Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API