Legal Opinion
Bookbinder v. Hults
New York Supreme Court
Decided October 1, 1959PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGeorge Eilperiu, J.
In this proceeding pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Act, petitioner seeks an order to restore his right to operate and register a motor vehicle in the State of New York. On November 25, 1958 such right had been revoked by the Commissioner of Motor Vehicles for a period of one year by reason of petitioner’s involvement on July 20, 1958 in an accident in the operation of his automobile while he did not have proper insurance coverage.
On the day of the accident petitioner was a resident of the State of Florida and was licensed by it to drive a motor vehicle. His automobile was also…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hess v. PawloskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Packard v. BantonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Continental Baking Co. v. WoodringSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- People ex rel. Pinello v. LeadbitterNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
- People ex rel. Pinello v. LeadbitterNew York Supreme Court · 1948
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- In re the Arbitration between Foster & Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1967
- Williams v. SillsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
- Langabeer v. HultsNew York Supreme Court · 1967
- Stevens v. HultsNew York Supreme Court · 1963
- MacArthur Drake v. Keith L. GordonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.