Legal Opinion

In Re One Chevrolet Automobile

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 10, 1921No. 7 Div. 95PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Section 11 of the Constitution of 1901, preserving the right of trial by jury, does not extend to causes unknown to the common law or to the statutory law as it existed at the time of the adoption of the Constitution. This provision extends only to those cases in which the right existed at the time of the adoption of same. Costello v. Feagin, 162 Ala. 191, 50 So. 134; Taliaferro v. Lee, 97 Ala. 92, 13 So. 125; Boring v. Williams, 17 Ala. 510; Chambers v. Stringer, 62 Ala. 569; State v. Bley, 162 Ala. 243, 50 So. 263. Section 13 of the Prohibition Act of 1919 (Laws 1919, p. 13) creates a cause…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ray v. WatkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  2. Boring v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1850
  3. Alabama Gold Life Insurance v. SledgeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1878
  4. State v. BleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  5. Taliaferro v. LeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Henderson by Hartsfield v. Alabama PowerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  2. Ex Parte GilesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
  3. Gilbreath Ex Rel. Watson v. WallaceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
  4. State v. Items of Real Property Owned and/or Possessed by ChilinskiMontana Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Tillery v. Commercial Nat. Bank of AnnistonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API