Legal Opinion · Dissent

State Ex Rel. McKenzie v. Smith

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided July 17, 2002No. 29645Published

1DissentDavis, C.J.

(Filed July 17, 2002)

“The right to dissent is the only thing that makes life tolerable for a judge of an appellate court.”1 As is evident from the numerous separate opinions I have authored this term, I find ever more frequently the need to exercise my right to dissent, and to urge my brethren to refrain from torturing the law of this state, and/or usurping the role of the legislature, to achieve them desired result du jour. And so, once again, I must disagree with the decision of the majority.

This case was brought as a simple request by Michael McKenzie for a writ of mandamus to compel the…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Christian Civic Action Committee v. McCuenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  2. Corman v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Quinn v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Stephen L.H. v. Sherry L.H.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State v. KernsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1990

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API