State Ex Rel. McKenzie v. Smith
West Virginia Supreme Court
1DissentDavis, C.J.
(Filed July 17, 2002)
“The right to dissent is the only thing that makes life tolerable for a judge of an appellate court.”1 As is evident from the numerous separate opinions I have authored this term, I find ever more frequently the need to exercise my right to dissent, and to urge my brethren to refrain from torturing the law of this state, and/or usurping the role of the legislature, to achieve them desired result du jour. And so, once again, I must disagree with the decision of the majority.
This case was brought as a simple request by Michael McKenzie for a writ of mandamus to compel the…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Christian Civic Action Committee v. McCuenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
- Corman v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
- Quinn v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Stephen L.H. v. Sherry L.H.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. KernsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1990
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.