Legal Opinion
Ali v. Fasteners for Retail, Inc.
District Court, E.D. California
Decided April 4, 2008No. CV 07-4009 GPS(JCX)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order Granting in Part, Denying in Part, Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss
GEORGE P. SCHIAVELLI, District Judge.
On March 24, 2008, the Court heard argument regarding Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint (“FAC”). After reviewing the filings, Defendants’ Motion is GRANTED in Part and DENIED in Part.
I. BACKGROUND
A. Factual Background
A1 Ali (“Plaintiff’) is the inventor and patent owner of the “Smart Pusher” inventory control system technology (“Smart Pusher”). (FAC ¶4.) Defendant Fasteners For Retail (“FFR”) is a corporation that produces merchandising systems for…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Navarro v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Silvaco Data Systems v. Intel Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2010
- Google LLC v. Sonos, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2022
- Medimpact Healthcare Systems, Inc. v. IQVIA Holdings Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2020