Legal Opinion

Byrd v. Thigpen

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided August 23, 1929No. 19824PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, C. J.

1. “The provision in the act of 1910 (Acts of 1910, p. 90, Park’s Ann. Code, § 828(e)), that any person operating an automobile on any of the highways of this State shall ‘ upon approaching a bridge, dam, high embankment, sharp curve, descent or crossing of intersecting highways [italics ours] and railroad crossings,’ so operate the same as that he may ‘ have it under control and operate it at a speed not greater than six miles per hour,’ is applicable to the public streets of a municipality.” Moye v. Reddick, 20 Ga. App. 649, 652 (93 S. E. 256), and cit. This ruling is not in conflict with…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Shannon v. MartinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
  2. Moye v. ReddickCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Keebler v. WillardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
  2. Sapp v. ElrodCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
  3. Petty v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API