Legal Opinion

Petty v. Moore

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 20, 1931No. 21159PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.

1. Eor a former decision in this'case, see Petty v. Moore, 40 Ga. App. 606 (150 S. E. 852). The provision of section 12(i) of the motor-vehicle act of 1927 (Ga. L. 1927, p. 226, 238), that “an operator shall reduce speed at crossing or intersection of highways,” is applicable not only to rural public roads but also to the public streets of *630the towns and cities of this State. This appears to be the only proper construction when section 12 is construed as a whole, and especially when subparagraphs a and h are considered. This ruling is not in conflict with the decision in Shannon v. Martin, 164…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Shannon v. MartinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
  2. Sapp v. ElrodCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
  3. Byrd v. ThigpenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
  4. Petty v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Gallahar v. George A. Rheman Co.District Court, S.D. Georgia · 1943
  2. Hennemier v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  3. Nipper v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954
  4. Tyson v. ShoemakerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
  5. Harrison v. LeagueCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API