Legal Opinion

United States v. Pendergrast

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided December 18, 1973No. 7391PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PAIR, Associate Judge:

The government appeals 1 from an order of the trial court holding insufficient and dismissing without prejudice the third count of an indictment which charged that “[on] or about August 13, 1972, within the District of Columbia, Willie E. Pender-grast broke open, opened, and entered without right a juke box, with intent to carry away a part of such device, and something contained therein.” [Emphasis supplied.]

The above-quoted language purports to charge appellee with a violation of D.C. Code 1973, § 22-3427, which provides:

Whoever in the District of Columbia breaks open,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Russell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Pettibone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. United States v. CarllSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  4. United States v. HessSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  5. United States v. SimmonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1878

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hackney v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Craig v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. United States v. OwensDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. United States v. MiqueliDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. Ingram v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API