Ingram v. United States

Following a jury trial, appellant was found guilty of second-degree burglary 1 and destruction of property with a value of less than two hundred dollars. 2 On appeal, appellant contends that (1) the trial court erroneously denied his motion for a judgment of' acquittal on the ground that a variance existed between the indictment and the government’s proof at trial, and (2) that the portion of the indictment which charged him with burglary was fatally defective. We affirm. 3

The first count of the grand jury’s indictment of appellant charges:

On or about June 26, 1975, within the District of…