Legal Opinion

United States v. United Marketing Ass'n

District Court, N.D. Iowa

Decided August 5, 1963No. Civ. No. 594Published

1Opinion of the Court

HANSON, District Judge.

The action here is one for conversion of grain. The plaintiff contends that the defendants purchased from a warehouseman converted corn. The Complaint in substance states that from January 1, 1950 to September 30, 1952, defendants converted 151,514.35 bushels of plaintiff’s corn by purchasing it from Burt Grain Company which held it in storage. The answer of the defendants as amended denies this and claims protection under Title 15, United States Code, Section 714p.

After the institution of the action and long prior to this submission and on July 25, 1960, the District…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Cusick v. Second Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
  2. Carson State Bank v. Grant Grain Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Hayne v. CookSupreme Court of Iowa · 1961
  4. Sexton v. GrahamSupreme Court of Iowa · 1880
  5. Hall v. PillsburySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API