Legal Opinion
SAIF Corp. v. Beswick
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided November 28, 1990No. WCB 86-00108; CA A62962PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Per curiam
Employer seeks review of the Workers’ Compensation Board’s decision affirming the referee’s order that granted claimant permanent total disability. We reverse and remand.
Employer contends that the case should be remanded, because the Board failed to make a finding about whether claimant was willing to seek employment. ORS 656.206(3) provides:
“The worker has the burden of proving permanent total disability status and must establish that the worker is willing to seek regular gainful employment and that the worker has made reasonable efforts to obtain such employment.”
In SAIF v. Stephen, 308 Or…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- SAIF Corp. v. StephenOregon Supreme Court · 1989
- SAIF Corp. v. OrrCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
3Cited by3 opinions
- Koskela v. Willamette Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- Koskela v. Willamette Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- Stephen v. Oregon ShipyardsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992